In February 2025, former Prime Minister of Mauritius, Pravind Jugnauth, was arrested on charges of money laundering. The arrest followed a raid by the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC) at his residence, where authorities seized 114 million Mauritian rupees (approximately $2.4 million). Jugnauth has been provisionally charged and denies the allegations.
Background of Pravind Jugnauth
Pravind Jugnauth served as Prime Minister of Mauritius from 2017 to 2024, succeeding his father, Anerood Jugnauth. During his tenure, he was also the Minister of Finance and the leader of the Militant Socialist Movement (MSM). His administration faced criticism over issues such as rising crime rates, corruption, and the high cost of living. In the 2024 general elections, Jugnauth’s party suffered a significant defeat, leading to his successor, Navin Ramgoolam, assuming office.
Details of the Arrest
The FCC’s investigation into Jugnauth’s financial activities culminated in the February 2025 raid. The substantial sum found at his residence has raised questions about the source of these funds. Jugnauth’s lawyer, Raouf Gulbul, has stated that his client denies the money laundering charges.
Political and Legal Implications
This arrest occurs amid broader concerns about financial transparency and governance in Mauritius. In November 2024, Prime Minister Navin Ramgoolam initiated an audit of public finances, questioning the accuracy of data from the previous administration. Additionally, the former central bank governor was detained and later released on bail after being charged with conspiracy to commit fraud.
Public Reaction and Future Developments
The arrest of a former prime minister has sparked widespread public interest and debate in Mauritius. The case is expected to have significant political ramifications, potentially influencing public trust in the current administration and the country’s financial institutions. As the legal proceedings unfold, further details are anticipated to emerge, shedding light on the extent of the alleged financial misconduct.
